I have struggled to take Dr David Martin seriously and so to date I haven’t really paid a lot of attention to what he says. Comments such as the one in the title haven’t exactly helped (it’s just showmanship not serious though), but after reading a transcript of his “last” speech I couldn’t help but try and do a bit of “fact-checking” on it, because if even only some of this is true it warrants further investigation.
Here’s the partial transcript (link to video of the speech included):
A co-founder of Facebook called Dustin Moskovitz (who I had indeed never heard of before) is according to Dr Martin one of the key actors in the COVID-19 response. According to the official Event 201 website:
Event 201 was supported by funding from the Open Philanthropy Project.
Moskovitz is a co-founder of the Open Philanthropy project:
According to Dr Martin, Moskovitz is also involved with Sherlock Biosciences:
He owns Sherlock Biosciences, who happen to be the company that owns the CRISPR technology that is the joint venture between the United States and China on gene-editing the human genome
…
In other words, using the cover of Covid – which all of us are pretending to talk about – the editing of the human genome was approved and not one of us said a thing.
I searched for any other reference to Moskovitz owning this company and found this page which at least mentions again funding from the Open Philanthropy Project via the Wikipedia page:
Thats sounds about right - Zuckerberg paying billions to rig elections, and this associate of his doing nefarious things with gene editing.
They’re all working overtime to manipulate the world to conform to their warped power fantasies.
What is all the indignation and what are all the dark hints about?
What’s the guy’s beef?
Please lay out the case. Who has done what? If it’s bad, what’s bad about it?
He never gets to the point. I’ve heard raving paranoics talk like that. Garrulous chatter about nothing. Irrational terrors never defined. If I’ve missed something, please tell me what it is.
I agree with you, Liz, about warped power fantasies. And Zuckerberg did pay to rig the 2020 elections. But I don’t get what exactly this doctor is angry about. I’m hoping Chauncey will explain it to me.
It’s very simple, and explained right at the top of the article:
I will speak where we the people decide that it is time this country does not allow any organisation, any institution, any financial interest, ever, EVER, in the future to kill five-year-olds in the name of science or in the name of policy or in the name of anything else.
The gist of the speech is that while we’re all focused on the public figures like Gates, the WEF etc. there are a number of people and organizations whose part in the whole diabolical scheme has been almost completely unnoticed and not commented on even in the alternative media. He’s right, because this Moskovitz who clearly was pushing Event 201 for example is someone I’d never heard of before. The organization called ANSER no doubt warrants further scrutiny as well, I’m going to listen to the speech again until I’ve memorized all the names iinvolved. The most bizarre one is Yo Yo Ma the cellist, I’m very intrigued to know more about that, I’ll update the topic when I find out why he was included.
Dr Martin is I believe absolutely right, we need to expose all these people, get a conversation going about them, hence why I posted this, don’t be distracted by the fact that he appears to have a few personal issues.
The nearest we come to any wrong-doing is the hint that until now some organizations, and/or institutions, and /or “financial interests” have been killing five-year-olds in the name of policy. I have to assume that he means the policy of vaccination. Is that right?
Okay, I’ll assume that’s what he means. Some very young children have been killed by Covid vaccinations. I believe that is true. And it is horrifying and very sad,
I’ll try to go on. This killing was the result of a bad policy. Forcing Covid vaccinations on children was bad policy, I agree. That policy is part of a diabolical scheme. Possibly. We do suspect that authoritarian governments, or the elite that work the governments, have a plan to increase their power. We know that “Gates, the WEF etc.” are part of that elite. But there must be others. It is possible that the plan was hatched by these others at something called Event 201. From investigation of which a name emerges. One of the major paymasters of Event 201 was a guy called Moskovitz. And the name of an organization, ANSER, is also found. Something’s going on. What, we don’t know, but we suspect it results in the killing of little children with Covid vaccine. And we the people will not stand for it. And Dr. Martin is very angry about it.
Is that it?
Let’s say that’s it. What’s new? What is even certain? The nasty scheme to impose the Great Reset has been known to us for years now. It is real, and it is to be resisted. But the rest? Dark suspicions. Righteous indignation at undefined possibilities. Protest at the as yet unknown. Isn’t that paranoia?
What’s Dr. Martin going to do about whatever it is?
If there really is a viable scheme afoot to experiment on us all with gene-altering stuff out of laboratories, then sure we need to know about it and stop it. I’m not saying it is impossible. I would put nothing beyond the Chinese Communists’ evil intentions. But bitter anger over vague horrors is not helpful. This man tries my patience.
This isn’t just some accidental collateral damage resulting from a policy mistake. The governments of the world knew that children were not at risk from the illness, and they knew that there was some risk from the jabs. The UK government even acted against the advice of the JCVI and went ahead with the jabbing of children regardless. What’s more, evidence of the risks has been continually mounting and yet even as recently as just 2 weeks ago the government EXPANDED the rollout to even younger children:
We need to raise awareness of the risks, and the fact that the people in power are WILFULLY ignoring those known risks!
He’s raising awareness of the people involved. At the very least this should lead to change politically, if not to criminal trials.
If he can stop the vaccinating of children by raising awareness that it is dangerous, then of course that is a very good thing. But is he going about it the right way? He gives an impression of being irrational. Too many hints at unnameable horrors.
OK, but others who are better at getting a message across will hear through channels (maybe even including your forum), and get the facts to a wider audience. I’ve been noticing this happening quite a lot in fact, that’s the beauty of mass communication in the internet era - word travels fast. There may be some things he said in this speech that are just plain wrong for all I know, but the first two or three things I checked turned out to be true, so it’s worth listening some more.
That’s fair. Spreading the word is a good in itself. Dr. Tess Lawrie is putting up the right sort of fight, and spreading the word. Thank you for introducing her and her campaign to us.
Yes, the fact that word travels fast by internet (even in spite of censorship) is our one advantage.
Also, I think Martins “paranoia” is justified.
Considering the enormity of the conspiracy and the crimes, its hard to overstate one’s outrage and indignation about it!
