The Pfizer documents

John Campbell is genuinely distressed over the findings and is almost apologetic for encouraging vaccinations in the early days.
Watch especially from about the 17 minute mark.

3 Likes

I already shared that video Cogito:

3 Likes

So very sorry. I missed your posting. He seems a good man struggling with the lies we’ve been fed for two years.

4 Likes

No problem, yes I have been following him with increasing interest wondering whether he would eventually do a full u-turn on the jabs, he’s almost there now.

2 Likes

Actually we need a dedicated topic for this subject, might as well use yours Cogito:

I’m moving on to other subjects now myself as I think the evidence is already compelling and the facts are already clear enough to take big pharma/Fauci/Gates to court for fraud at the very least, so I haven’t really studied these claims in detail.

2 Likes

Also a quite important point I think worth mentioning is that until now Dr Campbell has been repeatedly suggesting that the harms were caused by incorrect intravenous instead of intramuscular injections, and as I understood him failure to aspirate, but if I remember right he doesn’t mention these suspicions this time.

I always had doubts about his claim on this for the simple reason that again as I understand it, and it’s mentioned in the TCW article, that the injections do not in any case stay in the muscle/at the injection site anyway.

  1. It’s very clear in the documents that the vaccine does not stay at the injection site but travels extensively throughout the body.

NB. I have no medical knowledge it just seems to me to be a logical conclusion to come to.

2 Likes

So they lied about the injection staying at the injection site also. That makes sense.
In light of the fact that population control is one of Bill Gates pathological obsessions, they probably designed it purposely to go straight to the ovaries.
The fact that it also goes to the heart, brain, kidneys, etc, was of no concern to them, I’m sure.

3 Likes

You are absolutely correct

4 Likes

Yes I agree. He is a nurse with a PhD not an MD, but he is decent and fair minded. I was touched by the last few minutes of the video. He was manifestly shocked by the perfidy of the medical and governmental authorities.

4 Likes

More on John Campbell video

4 Likes

Wikipedia has predictably accused Dr Campbell of “spreading misinformation”:

Quote:

In March 2022, Campbell posted a misleading video about the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, claiming that a Pfizer document showed it was associated with 1,223 deaths. The video was viewed over 750,000 times and shared widely on social media. In reality, the documents cited explicitly disclaimed any connection between vaccinations and deaths reported.[4]

(this is out of date it has been shared nearly 2 million times now).

The page quotes this link:

“Pfizer’s confidential document shows adverse events reported following vaccination; it doesn’t demonstrate that the vaccine caused the events or is unsafe”

However the linked article says the data came from systems like VAERS / the Yellow Card system, the question of whether these systems give us any indication of whether the person really died from the jabs has been disputed, but even this article admits (in reference to the reports on these systems):

a temporal association is necessary

(in other words the person filing the report has hypothesized that there could have been a connection between the adverse event (AE) and the jab).

Also stated in the article:

The document doesn’t disclose the total number of people who had received the vaccine at the time the document was published.

Of course they don’t mention the fact that some experts have said these systems vastly underestimate the real numbers, as many AEs are dismissed by the doctors involved. My conclusion is that the FDA should have been alarmed by the numbers of potential deaths indicated by the reports, but instead they decided to proceed regardless.

This Wikipedia claim is very dubious, even if the documents do disclaim any connection this is a claim that the article they linked to implicitly contradicts:

the documents cited explicitly disclaimed any connection between vaccinations and deaths reported.

There simply wasn’t enough info about the AE deaths for that claim to be made at the time.

Dr Campbell doesn’t himself come out of this very well though for other reasons, because the information coming from the AE reporting systems was already known quite early on in the jab rollout program, and he also dismissed the data early on, he said anyone can fill out these reports (he later did a complete U-turn on that and said the reports would have been very difficult for a non-medical person to fill out).

3 Likes

“…the FDA should have been alarmed…”
But of course they weren’t, because they were in on it - it was a con game from the beginning, involving the conglomerate criminal enterprise of government, Pharma, doctors and media.
Campbell probably wasn’t “in on it”, but went along with it at first, I suppose, because a crime that egregious is hard to believe.

3 Likes

Perfectly stated.

4 Likes

We owe it to you, Cogito, that we learned the truth of this early on.

3 Likes

Dr. Hodkinson’s dictum remains true:

“There are no means known to medical science to stop the spread of respiratory viruses” Period.

This means that masks, business closures, school closures, lockdowns, social distancing, and mandatory vaccinations do not work. This was easily predictable. Every medical student should now this.

3 Likes

Yes, everyone knew that, but then we entered a mind Warp, created by the propaganda offensive which resulted in mass psychosis…

2 Likes