Dr John Campbell is “not happy” and questions the summary in the FDA report, describing it as a scandal perhaps on a par with Watergate:
The summary as quoted under the video (which he questions based on the numbers of adverse events mentioned in the details):
confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2. Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
He also links to Children’s Health Defense (Robert Kennedy Jr.'s website). Finally Dr Campbell seems to be questioning the risk/benefit ratio for the Pfizer jab, particularly considering the claimed mildness of Omicron.
In Hong Kong they started collecting the data [on myocarditis] 425 cases per million - 200 times more than we were told [referring to the risk for children].
“Perhaps on a par with Watergate”?? He needs to catch up a little. We’ve already made Watergate look like a pimple on Godzilla’s rear end!
Take your pick on which recent scandal to compare it to. But Pfizer should go down in history as one of the worst.
Agreed, but coming from Dr Campbell this is a massive admission, and amazingly he’s still on Youtube and still gaining more followers 2.27 million now, he gained another 10,000 just overnight, and 1.3 million views for the video already. I’m actually becoming very curious about the amount of dissent that Youtube is allowing, it’s almost as if Google might be becoming more open-minded.
