Why the FDA Should Not Have Approved the Pfizer Jab for Infants

Dr Clare Craig:

Quote:

The trial recruited 4,526 children aged from six months to four years-old. 3,000 of these children did not make it to the end of the trial. That is a huge number. Two thirds of them. Why was there this drop off? That needs to be answered. And without an answer to that, on that basis alone this trial should be deemed null and void.

2 Likes

What sort of parents let their babies be experimented on with potentially lethal poisons?

(Rhetorical question, of course.)

3 Likes

I’m assuming “did not make it” means that they got covid, not that they died?
But even if they survived, it’s still a dishonest study.
And yes, they didn’t recruit the children - the poor children had no choice!

3 Likes

No I understood “did not make it” meant they dropped out of the trial for un-stated reasons, thereby invalidating the other results because they might have been negative results for the trial.

2 Likes

I saw a troubling statistic in the Telegraph that suggested the vast majority of over 12 year olds in the UK are already jabbed, this suggests to me the answer to your question is - the vast majority unfortunately.

2 Likes