Russia-Ukraine Crisis 2.0

Foreign affairs
#401

Yazmin, please post the articles and videos you want us to see SEPARATELY, not in pairs or groups. Each needs to provide the opportunity to be commented on SEPARATELY.

1 Like
#402

Remember this tweet from Darren Beattie that said that NATO is playing a role in internet censorship?

This was from 2018, Facebook teaming up with NATO to censor news.

2 Likes
#403

NATO, aided and abetted by our trusty CIA, I’m sure


1 Like
#404
1 Like
#405

“Fink also praised how global corporate elites banded together following Russia’s invasion and isolated Moscow from the global financial system overnight**, paralyzing the country’s economy. He said the private sector demonstrated the power of the capital markets:

“Russia has been essentially cut off from global capital markets, demonstrating the commitment of major companies to operate consistent with core values. This “economic war” shows what we can achieve when companies, supported by their stakeholders, come together in the face of violence and aggression,” he said.”

“Frink has made clear the conflict in Ukrainian is being used as an accelerator to reorganize the global economy as the old world order crumbles and a multipolar world emerges. Supply chains will be onshored or moved closer to home, and the WEF’s agenda of a green new world, more corporate surveillance, and trackable money are inevitable this decade.”

1 Like
#406
1 Like
#407

Yazmin, please do not post 3 together like this. Please post each separately.

1 Like
#408

A Conservative writer wants the West to be nicer to Putin. WHY?

‘Diplomacy will require, yes, “appeasing” Putin a little and recognizing that he has rational strategic interests. The West is quick to dismiss Russian grievances with NATO expansion as nothing but a pretext for imperial ambition, but the West has made no serious effort—despite repeated warnings—to restrain its own imperial ambitions in Putin’s backyard. It doesn’t take a “Putin apologist” to understand that Western meddling in Ukraine has been needlessly provocative, and that it poses an obvious, logical threat to Russian security.’

WHAT IS THE “OBVIOUS LOGICAL THREAT” THAT NATO AND THE WEST POSE TO “RUSSIAN SECURITY”?

WHAT “IMPERIAL AMBITIONS” DOES NATO HAVE?

1 Like
#409
#410
#411
#412
#413
#414