Here is a companion article on Ukraine/Israeli relations, highlighting the malice of the Obama/Biden foreign policy to Israel:
The article suggests that Obamaâs entire European/Middle-Eastern foreign policy was a contrivance to achieve policide against Israel. This tail-wagging-the-dog view is not implausible. Why did Obama adopt the anti-American, irrational, deadly and destructive policy which created the dangerous Russia-Iran axis? No American interests are being furthered by it. There is no political or economic value to it. One must look for explanations in ideological motivation: binding together the terrible alliance between collectivist leftism, militaristic despotism and militant Islam is anti-semitism, in the post-Nuremberg trials, Zionism-is-Racism guise. It may be that once again there is conflagration because power-hungry despots believe that Jews are impeding Utopia (âglobal peace and democracyâ).
This is dated 8 Dec 21 - before Russia invaded Ukraine. The gist of it - that the money should be spent at home, for our own border security - will not appeal as widely now that there is war. Public sentiment favors sending aid to Ukraine.
What a mess. Both Obama and Biden have âaided and abbettedâ our enemy Iran, and made it impossible for Israel to defend itself against Iran by pitting Russia against them.
They have abused both Israel and Ukraine shamefully.
âAccording to the Bild newspaper , the suspects are a 37-year-old Tunisian and a 26-year-old Nigerian. They also had a Ukrainian passport with them. According to information from the newspaper, officials in the border area have recently encountered migrants who did not come directly from Ukraine, but for example from Africa.â
Yes, Biden is already using the Ukraine crisis as an excuse for the trainwreck he has made of our economy, which was already well underway before the war even started.
Hereâs PJW talking about the âUkrainian refugeesâ.
Yes, a few of the thousands of ârefugeesâ and/or illegal aliens Biden letâs in every month should be sent straight to the White House and his vacation home. Iâm sure heâs got room in his basement!
Ha! Well I guess Ukraine isnât the holy grail of democracy and freedom after allâŚ
âFirst, there is the moral side of the issue. Like a pawn in a chess game, Washington, in fact, has sacrificed a large and friendly European country.â
âUkraine turns into Libya: it will be destroyed and torn to pieces, and millions of people will become refugees or die. Such a terrible human tragedy does not pay off any geopolitical goals, and the cynicism with which it was done completely undermines the authority of and trust in America, which is already greatly undermined.â
âSecondly, such games can have unpredictable consequences. No one could have imagined that the triumph of the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan would turn into the rise of Islamic jihad and murderous terror in Western countries, including 9/11. How will Putin behave when he is cornered? Will we face the threat of a full unconventional war? What forces will triumph on the ruins of Ukraine and probably Russia? Wonât this give rise to new leaders, far more dangerous than Putin? Will new Islamic caliphates, like the Islamic State, appear on the territory of weak and disintegrated Russia? We donât have answers to these questions.â
âThird, tactical victory relays the seeds of strategic failure. Before World War II, the UK and France pushed Mussolini away, throwing him into the arms of Hitler, the main enemy of the West. Today, the US and Europe are pushing Russia away from them, throwing it into the arms of the powerful China, although they should have acted in exactly the opposite way. It is difficult to imagine a greater stupidity than to strengthen the Chinese totalitarian empire with your own hands.â
Yes, it is a terrible strategy - either out of stupidity or on purpose, but either way, a recipe for disaster.
I cannot understand why Robert Spencer has quoted this article. Unless to demonstrate a typical indefensible opinion of pro-Russian propagandists.
It is out of date. irrelevant, and WRONG.
The US did NOT drag Russia into a guerrilla war! Soviet Russia made war all by itself on Afghanistan.
Now Russia, still a ruthless aggressor under the dictatorship of a vicious despot, has invaded its neighbor Ukraine, an independent country. Is that the fault of the US?
Yazmin, if you agree with the article, please tell us your reasons.
It doesnât mention it in this article, but Iâve heard it mentioned elsewhere that the West, or US, is trying to bring about âregime changeâ in Russia.
They are trying to push the Russians into turning on Putin, so he can be replaced.
I have no idea if this is true or not, but I know that our CIA has a history of doing things like this.
They did it in Ukraine, and even in the US itself!
So this could be what heâs referring to in saying that the US had something to do with the war.
Yazmin. What are you trying to do? Please stop piling on the videos and opinion without saying why, and tell us what you are getting at by doing this. What do you yourself believe? For what reasons? It is time you made your purpose clear. Please.
"Washington, in fact, has sacrificed a large and friendly European country.â
IN FACT?
AMERICA has âsacrificedâ Ukraine? How?
So the war in Ukraine, all the suffering, is Americaâs fault? You believe that, Yazmin? Why?
And our patriotic readers and commenters, where are you on all this? Speak!
Iâve watched the first one, with Bannon, and he is saying that creating a âNo fly zoneâ and sending arms to Zelensky, as some of our congressmen and journalists are urging, is dangerous and irresponsible, as it could trigger a larger conflict.
I agree with that, and I think we should instead be pressuring Zelensky to agree to some form of peace agreement to end the conflict.
So I would agree that the war is Americaâs âfaultâ only in the sense that our government is encouraging its continuation by sending Zelensky money and arms rather than pressuring him to accept terms of peace. So far at least - to their credit - they havenât agreed to declare a No fly zone.