He says that 40% of his patients had significant adverse events. Steve Kirsch interviewed him and wrote a supporting substack article:
SK links to an article at the BMJ on a study which states 37% adverse events, but the study conclusion says:
Conclusion The safety profiles of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with I-RMD was reassuring and comparable with patients with NI-RMDs. The majority of patients tolerated their vaccination well with rare reports of I-RMD flare and very rare reports of serious AEs. These findings should provide reassurance to rheumatologists and vaccine recipients and promote confidence in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety in I-RMD patients.
I think I’m more inclined to believe Dr Jackson’s assessment.
PS The key point here is that his patients have higher levels of immune suppression due to auto-immune diseases, so the percentage of people affected by AEs is much higher than in the numbers jabbed overall.
There’s an awful lot in this interview, it’s well worth listening to in full (32 mins). At one point (@28mins) he admits that he is:
almost afraid to say
when SK asks him about the effectiveness of alternative treatments. Get that - a doctor is afraid to talk about very successful results of alternative stem cell treatments. The reason he is afraid is the hospital fires doctors who dissent from the official narrative.
Yes, he’s afraid because hes being intimidated by the Mafia - the criminals now running the government/corporate cartel that profits off the sale of the vaccines. These huge numbers od adverse events and deaths are just “collateral damage” to them.
