In this article about covid vaccine effects on menstruation, the words “woman” or “women” occur zero times, where the word “people” is substituted instead (nine instances of that). In addition to “postmenopausal people”, we also see “pre- and post-menopausal individuals”. They call it “gender-affirming” hormone treatments or hormones – estrogen suppression and testosterone supplementation, etc. – when those are really gender-denying, or they wouldn’t need to be given in the first place.
5 Likes
Yes, as always, everything they say is the opposite of what it really means. “Gender affirmation” is really gender suppression - a rejection of reality.
And rather than “health care”, it’s actually the deliberate promotion of procedures that are detrimental to both physical and mental health.
It proves how far these sociopaths are willing to go in destroying lives in order to further their agenda.
4 Likes
“Among those who participated in the study who typically do not menstruate, 71% of people on long-acting reversible contraceptives, 39% of people on gender-affirming hormones and 66% of postmenopausal people reported breakthrough bleeding.”
“71% of people on long-acting reversible contraceptives”… so, 71% of people including men and women or 71% of just 51% of the population aka women?
2 Likes
Good question! Their mangling of the language confuses everything.
3 Likes