Makes perfect sense…
1 Like
Mmmm … maybe. Partly true, I guess. But not the whole story.
We’ll probably be told what happened. What was decided when and why behind the scenes. Some day.
An inter-Murdoch drama is back there somewhere, I suspect.
2 Likes
Indeed. As I understand it, Tucker cannot take on any other cable network news broadcast. But…he can do podcasts, interviews, etc. online.
O’Reilly and Beck saw hundreds of new memberships to their internet stations the day of the announcement. I suspect other conservative sites found the same increase in traffic.
1 Like
Yes, they definitely wanted to shut him up.
Just like the Bud Light people were willing to lose customers to please their Blackrock overlords, Fox is willing to lose viewers just to please theirs.
1 Like
The brewing company lost a bundle, but it is a pittance to please the ESG gods. He is also doing Oil of Olay, Maybelline, and Nike…and making a small fortune.
2 Likes
And is most likely a true mysoginist, as Lia Thomas has been exposed as. They’ve uncovered tweets, etc. of Thomas approving of such things as a woman getting her skull bashed in by another woman-hating transgender in a boxing match.
2 Likes
The transgender movement and the drag queen extravaganzas mock women as women have never been mocked before.
And millions of American women passionately support the mockery without realizing that that’s what it is. They believe it is all just part of the progressive political program of the Democratic Party.
2 Likes
Yes, it seems the more we “progress”, the further we regress into complete stupidity.
2 Likes
The volunteer fire departments used to have womanless beauty/talent pageants around here. And long ago we used to have minstrel shows, although I never saw any blackface when I was old enough to enjoy what had become simply very good local talent shows.
Anyway, the womenless pageants were hilarious good fun and they raised a lot of money. The “contestants” were so obviously not women, not feminine, not beautiful and mostly not talented, although some fellows did okay.
I don’t guess that would be considered harmless fun to raise money anymore.
But, I am at all certain why it wouldn’t be. Can’t anyone pretend, or is that reserved for a special class?
1 Like
The drag queens show their genitals to little children, dance obscenely, “twerk” at them (a disgusting vulgarity) - and read pornography aloud to their very young audiences. It’s called “grooming”.
Firemen wearing women’s clothes and clowning to raise money is an utterly different affair, harmless and fun.
As for the pretense of being female (or male) through “transgendering”, it’s not immoral - just bizarre - if an adult decides to do it for himself (herself). It is criminal (or should be) and cruel if adults do it to children.
But you know all that, of course?
2 Likes
Do you not think the appearance of the drag queens at those shows in schools is a mockery of women?
Have you seen them? The wigs, the dresses, the make-up, the performances?
Isn’t Dylan Mulvaney’s sweet littler girl act a mockery of women?
Feminists deserve to be mocked. But they are a very small minority. All women are being mocked by Mulvaney and the grooming drag queens.
2 Likes
Yes, I agree with you on all counts, Jillian. I was merely remembering when there were such things as womenless beauty/talent pageants where MEN PRETENDED to be glamour gals to raise money for worthy causes.
Now MEN PRETEND and all must not call attention to that fact.
And, all Trans-Women are not Drag Queens. And all Drag Queens are not pedophiles, who get off sexually performing for or around children.
Many trans-people are rather normal in their appearance and behavior. I have always contended that a trans-woman in a women’s restroom, should barely be noticed if dressed and behaved normally…as a woman using a restroom, washing hands, checking hair, etc.
Just as many gays are rather normal in their appearance and behavior.
1 Like