Quote:
Activist and investor Julie Kalish wanted to urge Walmart to look into “any known and any potential risks and costs to the company caused by enacted or proposed state policies severely restricting reproductive rights” by the end of the year.
Comment:
What is a “reproductive right”? Where does it come from? Who or what granted it? Who enforces it?
Women have a right to kill their babies?
Anyway, the shareholders rejected Kalish’s demand.
A weird aspect of the terms ‘reproductive rights’ and ‘planned parenthood’ is that they’re about neither reproduction nor parenthood, but their negations.
I’m surprised Walmart rejected that, since they must answer ro Vanguard and Blackrock, etc, and have already caved in to the “sustainability” and “diversity training” agendas (and who knows what else).
