Obama - a Destructive and Divisive President

Quotes from the linked article:

Obama was never the leader of anything, neither then nor now.

Post-presidency, Obama was fixated on collecting laundered wealth from intermediaries such as Spotify and Netflix, buying luxury properties, and hanging out on private yachts with celebrities. His stratospheric levels of egotism and absence of self-awareness motivated him to occasionally appear in public next to Biden as a larger, more popular figure, signaling that he was “The One” who was calling the shots. We know this to be completely false.

Obama has been a down-ballot disaster for Democrats. But it has been a goldmine for Obama … We have to wonder how anyone in the Democrat Party thinks they got their money’s worth with Obama.

It’s not hard to see how rewarding this was for Obama. He knew that division and racial strife were the path to electoral victory for the left. By reigniting animosities and weaponizing the federal government against his political opponents, a process that intensified during the Biden administration, Obama took extreme, unprecedented measures to achieve short-term gains and position himself as the central figure in Democrat political circles.

He wanted fame, fortune, adulation, worship, and no accountability. He achieved all of that and more, becoming the de facto “kingmaker” of the Democrat Party.

What exactly were the motives of Democrats when they elevated a junior senator from Illinois to be the central figure of their party? To answer that question, one must understand the criminal enterprise that Washington, D.C., has become over six decades and the need for an effective frontman to charm the population.

Obama was the DEI-approved face of the Democrat machine that could operate with near impunity, reflexively branding any attempt to resist or criticize him as racist. A political and racial arsonist to his core, Obama scorched the earth at every opportunity and dared anyone to challenge him. It was the most destructive and divisive presidential period in modern history.

Obama utilized the radicalism that was honed during his time as a “community organizer” in Chicago and applied it to the nation. He engineered conflict, caused chaos, and pitted people against each other. It was the classic Marxist notion of “oppressor versus oppressed,” where winners and losers, villains and heroes, innocence and guilt, are unilaterally determined. People were labeled, vilified, categorized, and ostracized from society simply by their beliefs. Violence against them was justified and even celebrated.

Democrats were genuinely “riding the tiger” with Obama and were unsure exactly where he would lead them. Well, here we are—a nation completely divided, at each other’s throats, leveling hyperbolic charges against strangers, all because we had to have the equivalent of a DEI hire in the White House to assuage our “racial strife". And how is that “racial strife” going today?

More to the point, “How are the Democrats doing today with Obama as their de facto leader?” Horribly, as the 2024 election has proven.

With the electoral drubbing Democrats took last week, with recriminations on who to blame being spread across Democrat circles, Obama’s political “brilliance” has been revealed as pure fiction. You can say that the mask has been ripped off with the presidency and both Houses of Congress now in Republican hands.

.

Comment:

The article has appeal to conservatives because it takes Obama down – all the way down, as he deserves.

And it praises Trump, which is even more appealing.

But Obama was twice elected to the presidency. What does that say about the American electorate? What did his voters expect of him? Did they, as the authors of the article say, hope he would “assuage racial strife”? Or did the Democrats hope he would exacerbate it?

1 Like

Yes, presented as the poster boy for racial “redemption”, his real agenda was to “engineer conflict” and “chaos”, destroying decades of actual progress in race relations.
He was worse than an incompetent “DEI hire” - he was a communist “Manchurian Candidate” purposely planted to destroy the country.
We have seen for the last eight years the results of allowing a communist to run the country for two terms - our government, and all our institutions, have come under the control of the traitors that he appointed.

1 Like

Obama is a narcissistic anti-Semitic race hustler. Yes, to their shame, American voters elected him twice. However, to their glory, Americans rejected him and his repugnant agenda this year.

2 Likes

I remember thinking, at the time, that his elections must have been rigged. But with all the rigging thats gone on since then, it may never be investigated. I’m just glad we were able to beat the fraud on this one.

1 Like

I think Trump may have relegated him to the proverbial dust bin of history.

2 Likes

As a political villain, that’s what he deserves.

But what had he to do with the suspicious death of his chef at Martha’s Vineyard, I wonder. We have heard nothing from the dead man’s widow. We don’t know why the Obama daughters were sent away so quickly.

I am too old now to go investigating. But there are reporter-sleuths whose self-chosen job it is to find out the truth about shocking events involving people in the public eye, and they are all silent on this matter.

1 Like

Yes, it should be investigated further, but I wonder if the reason it’s not is because it’s just buried under such a huge mountain of crime and treason involving our government in the last several years.
There is so much - where do you even start?

1 Like

See also this:

2 Likes

Thanks for the link, Cogito.

The article is well worth reading. Here’s how it ends:

"On January 17, 2017, Obama[ invited a group of journalists to a secret White House meeting. A 21-page transcript which was only recently released, reveals that Obama used this meeting to carefully plant the fraudulent Russia collusion narrative in the minds of the attending journalists. He did this despite knowing that the entire situation was a hoax. But Obama ensured that the media perceived things otherwise, providing not only the presidential seal of approval to the Russia collusion hoax but also the impression of confirmation from someone with access to all the relevant secret intelligence. In other words, Obama abused the presidency to ensure that his successor would be burdened with the incessant Russia collusion narrative.

"Obama’s central role in promoting the Russia collusion hoax was partially revealed by former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, who in 2020 disclosed details of the July 2016 meeting between Obama and Brennan. Other intelligence officials within the Trump administration, including his first Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, had access to the same information as Ratcliffe. However, instead of speaking out, they actively sought to undermine the president they were supposed to serve. Ratcliffe’s recent nomination as CIA Director represents not only a significant step toward reforming the intelligence community but also suggests that accountability for Obama may finally be on the horizon."

I fervently hope so! President Trump is the man who will clean out the accumulated Leftist sewage.

1 Like

The dishonesty of Obama was intense. He is capable of any malfeasance.

1 Like

Some of John Brennan’s disgusting lies:

1 Like

Yes, “Obama abused the Presidency”, as Brennan abused his position as head of the CIA - how could anyone not have expected it?
That’s what communists do!
I’m looking forward with great anticipation to a complete exposure of the crimes committed by these traitors, and a thorough purging of the entire government during the next four years.

1 Like

If anyone can cleanse this cesspool, it is Trump.

2 Likes