I have seen a video of a Syrian terrorist who cuts the chest of a man who is still alive while others hold him down, extracts his heart and eats it for the cameras.
The [pro-Hamas] BBC had already interviewed a Syrian terrorist who tears out a heart and eats it.
An appeal by French intellectuals and scholars was published in Le Point: “Several thousand Alawite civilians have been massacred in recent days in Syria by the forces of the Islamist regime. Newborns, children, elderly people, women, men: hundreds of videos, authenticated by various press outlets and NGOs, testify to systematic summary executions with the clear will to annihilate a people considered heretical”.
The Spectator called it “the massacre of the innocents” in the only European cover dedicated to this barbarity.
Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas, asked his men to bring him the hearts of Israelis, literally.
Now the Islamic dictator of Damascus has arrived in Brussels [to beg for money, apparently].
[With what result?]
Ursula von der Leyen [elite-appointed head of the ruling EU Commission] promises 2.5 billion euros to Syria.
This Catholic and conservative periodical, published in Britain, concerned with news about Israel, denies that Christians have been or are being killed in Syria.
It regards Prime Minister Netanyahu as an enemy.
A British conservative Catholic periodical, generally pro-Israel, against Prime Minister Netanyahu?
Tablet seems to veer into intense anti-Jewish stupidity from time to time:
Quote:
In 2012, Tablet published a review of Breaking Bad by author Anna Breslaw in which Breslaw criticized Holocaust survivors, including those in her family, as “villains masquerading as victims who, solely by virtue of surviving (very likely by any means necessary), felt that they had earned the right to be heroes, conniving, indestructible, taking and taking”. Jeffrey Goldberg observed in The Atlantic that Tablet had “brought together Commentary’s John Podhoretz and The Nation’s Katha Pollitt by publishing a vicious attack on Holocaust survivors”, and called for the magazine to publish an apology to Holocaust survivors. The magazine did apologize for publishing Breslaw’s piece. In These Times, staff writer Lindsay Beyerstein described the article as “the worst thing that Tablet has ever published” and “a disgrace on every level”.
In October 2017, Tablet published an article by contributor Mark Oppenheimer titled “The Specifically Jewish Perviness of Harvey Weinstein”. The article argued that the sexual assaults by Harvey Weinstein were distinctly Jewish and was shared favorably by David Duke and neo-Nazi Richard Spencer. [Please not to be confused with very pro-Jewish Robert Spencer - J.B.] Oppenheimer issued an apology for the piece, which was described in Jewish left-leaning quarterly magazine Jewish Currents as both supporting “an antisemitic stereotype” and avoiding discussion of “the rampant misogyny that exists in both the Jewish and non-Jewish worlds”.
The Tablet’s intermittent flirting with anti-Jewish idiocy is as disconcerting as it is inexplicable.
Jillian what conservative Catholic journal are you referring to?
You are right. The Tablet is, indeed, a Catholic publication. I was confusing it with the Jewish online magazine Tablet. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
This article “The Right’s Sectarian Moment” at tabletmag, although confusing (I’ll probably have to re-read it a few times to unravel the entire can of worms) actually seems to be criticizing Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, not Netanyahu.
For very convoluted reasons I can’t quite fathom, they are pushing some sort of Christian sectarianism and blaming Israel for the middle easts problems, which somehow also lines up with Obama’s policies.
What, if any, sense do you make of it?
