Quote:
The Law: “Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
The law is strikingly clear. It is a crime to protest “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge” with “the intent of influencing any judge". Violating this law are those by protesting outside the residences of six justices in the hopes of persuading them to rule a certain way.
It is Attorney General Merrick Garland’s sworn duty to uphold federal law, and he is not doing that. Why? Garland is pro-abortion. That’s why. If they were pro-life protesters out there, you can bet Garland would have already rounded them up.
Once again, it is plain to see that in this country, there is one law for people on the left and another for people on the right.
2 Likes
Oh yes. If they were pro life, he’d call them domestic terrorists and throw them in the D.C. jail.
He’s a disgrace.
2 Likes