“Let’s for a moment think of the best case scenario, where we are able to show (somehow) that DNS communication exists between Trump and R[ussia]. How do we plan to defend against the criticism that this is not spoofed traffic we are observing? There is no answer to that. Let’s assume again that they are not smart enough to refute our “best case” scenario. You do realize that we will have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make a very weak association? Let’s all reflect upon that for a moment. Sorry folks, but unless we get combine netflow and DNS traffic collected at critical points between suspect organizations, we cannot technically make any claims that would fly public scrutiny.The only thing that drives us at this point is that we just do not like Trump. This will not fly in eyes of public scrutiny. Folks, I am afraid we have tunnel vision. Time to regroup?”
Let that last paragraph sink in.
Team Clinton had researchers tying themselves into knots trying to come up with a way to discredit Trump. They simply could not find anything.
3 Likes
The researcher ADMITS that they could not “make any claims that would fly public scrutiny”.
They had nothing! But they went ahead and did it anyway, and as he predicted, it didn’t fly.
It was the most obvious, transparently false BS imaginable, but that didn’t matter to them - they had the media on their side, so why not?
3 Likes