Genocidal Terrorists Accuse Their Victims of Genocide

Alan Dershowitz writes about the “International Court of Justice”, to which the terrorist-governed state of South Africa - where white farmers are in fear of their lives because they are white - is bringing a charge of “genocide” against the state of Israel. The far-left government of South Africa is doing this for its allies, the Muslim Brotherhood’s terrorist organization Hamas, elected by the Palestinians in the Gaza strip to be their government.

The first leader of the Muslim Arabs in the British mandated territory of Palestine - as it was called after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire of which it had been part - was Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem. He encouraged his friend and ally Adolf Hitler to pursue his “final solution of the Jewish problem” by annihilating the Jewish people. That is the crime of genocide. Hitler killed more than a third of the world’s Jews - 6 million of 16.6 million. (There are now, close to 80 years since the end of Hitler’s regime, about 15 million Jews in the world with 1 state. There are about 456 million Arabs with 22 Arab states, and over 2 billion Muslims, with 48 Muslim-ruled sates.)

The “Palestinians” and millions of their sympathizers on all the inhabited continents, are now again passionately demanding the genocide of the Jews.

But it is the Jewish state of Israel that is being accused of the crime!

Quoting Dershowitz:
What is the International Court of Justice? It is not international, because it excludes judges from certain countries. It is not a real court, because the judges are selected by their countries and many of them simply follow the instructions of those who appointed them. And it has never done justice, because it has long been biased against Israel. It is the United Nations court, and that tells you all you need to know about it.
The United Nations has become the megaphone of bigotry and anti-Semitism. Both the United Nations and its court are shams.
It is the Hamas charter that calls for genocide against the Jews of Israel, and it is South Africa that is harboring Hamas terrorists and defending its murders and rapes. It should be Hamas that is on trial for attempted genocide and South Africa that is on trial for complicity with Hamas. Instead, the nation-state of the Jewish people is being accused of a blood libel, despite going to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties in its legitimate efforts to destroy Hamas.
The evidence is indisputable that Hamas has committed numerous war crimes. First, it attacked Israeli civilians attending a music festival and living in peace. Second, it ordered its terrorists to rape and sexually assault its victims, thus weaponizing sexual assault during wartime. Third, it has fired thousands of rockets at Israeli civilian targets. Fourth, it has built tunnels with exits near Israeli civilian areas, whose purpose it is to murder and kidnap civilians. Fifth, it has deliberately placed its rocket launchers and command centers in civilian areas, in order to induce Israel to cause collateral damage among civilians. Sixth, it has used children and even babies as human shields to prevent Israel from rescuing its hostages. Seventh, it has taken over hospitals, schools, mosques and other civilian resources and turned them into military assets. Eighth, it has recruited 13- and 14-year-old boys and girls to become terrorists. Ninth, it has coerced women into becoming suicide bombers targeting Israeli civilians. Tenth, it arranged for civilian workers from Gaza to get jobs in Israel in order to provide them information they used to murder Israeli civilians.
The crime of genocide requires an intent to destroy an entire people, based on ethnicity, race or religion. It also requires actions, calculated to achieve that goal. Israel has done exactly the opposite in relation to the Arabs and Muslims of Gaza. It ended the occupation in 2005, leaving behind farming equipment and other material resources that could have been used to turn Gaza into Singapore on the Mediterranean. It has provided medical services to Gazans in need of Israel’s exceptional resources. It has provided employment for thousands of Gazans with good pay. The end result is that the population of the Gaza Strip has increased dramatically over the years during which Israel has been accused of genocide. These are not the indicia of genocide. What Israel has done has been based on one consideration alone: namely the need to protect its own civilians from efforts by Hamas to conduct genocide against its Jewish civilians.
Were the International Court of Justice to falsely conclude that Israel was guilty of genocide, it would destroy whatever remaining credibility that court might have. If that were to happen, the United States and some other nations should and probably would leave the court: it would not deserve the legitimacy afforded by membership of any decent country.

Comment:
“The United Sates and some other nations” probably would not.

The UN must be destroyed!

1 Like

Dershowitz is right - “both the UN and it’s court are shams.” But you’re right - under our present illegitimate government, the U.S. probably won’t withdraw from either one. The only chance we have of doing that (and still not a guarantee) is if Trump, by some “miracle”, gets re-elected. (Maybe Dershowitz will vote for him now?!)
I saw on youtube - “South African Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein Gives His Verdict on the UN…”
He gives an excellent opinion on it, too.

1 Like

Thank you for telling us about Rabbi Goldstein’s verdict on the UN, Liz.

I will find it if I can, and post it.

1 Like

Yes, Trump might well withdraw the US from membership of the court. Perhaps he might even withdraw the US from membership of the UN. That would destroy the UN - the fate it deserves.

1 Like

Here’s the Chief Rabbi of South Africa explaining perfectly why the “international Court of Justice” cannot by the very nature of its constitution deliver a just verdict; not on Israel, not on any country or any case whatsoever:

2 Likes