This ought to be in several different categories including also Crime, Politics, Media. My latest post:
The Center for Health Security partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to host a coronavirus pandemic exercise called Event 201 in October 2019, six weeks before the first case of symptom onset of COVID-19.
I have been wary of the lab leak theory for reasons I’ve mentioned here before, but now I’ve got a reason to take it a bit more seriously.
Thanks, I’m glad you’re researching this! Yes, isn’t it interesting that they had these planning exercises to think of ways to “diminish the economic and societal impact” of such a pandemic.
We now know that the virus was engineered, and the response to it was deadlier than the virus itself. It seems obvious to me that what they were actually planning was how to use a fake “pandemic” to CAUSE economic and societal disaster, not diminish it!
It all points to a very sinister motive.
Somebody in the comments section under my article just pointed out this truly astonishing coincidence - the World Military Games began in China on the very exact same day as the Event 201 pandemic planning exercise began.
A link to a study on the possible impact of the Games for the benefit of those who hadn’t been aware (I’d only faintly been aware of it):
“The impact of the World Military Games on the COVID-19 pandemic”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813667/
In a German town, years ago, a statistician was able to prove that the number and times of the births of babies coincided with the number of storks that came there to nest and the times they appeared. It was therefore an inevitable conclusion that the storks brought the babies.
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
It’s a good story to remind us not to get carried away, but the analogy breaks down quite a lot surely in this instance. Storks obviously have nothing to do with human births whereas Bill Gates’s fingerprints are all over this supposed pandemic, his foundation funds the media that prints the stories, his foundation funds the academics that produce the alarming predictions that spark the panic (predictions that later turn out to be false).
There were huge conflicts of interest involved in the event for example the pharmaceutical industry was represented, there was specific talk of vaccinations as the cure for the coronavirus which turned out to be the only solution that people were allowed to even contemplate (until Pfizer and Merck had rushed out their own alternative drugs). The global corp that wants no doubt to permanently shut down social media because it’s undermining the old print media that they are probably involved with somehow, and social media is making it harder for global inc. to control everything.
The WMG was held in Wuhan which is exactly where the virus was supposed to originate, the same governments that were involved in the event also had service people at the games, etc.
No doubt we could add many more.
There really are a lot of coincidences and conflicts of interest here, surely enough coincidences for hearings to be called for don’t you think?
Yes, I think there are way too many “coincidences” here, especially when you find out all the connections these people have behind the scenes, and the lockstep responses they’ve all had to the “pandemic”.
Yes, certainly there are.
Say it with words, and it makes sense.
I found another even stranger coincidence since I wrote the first post - their simulation scenario involved a coronavirus that originated in bats. As promised I have now watched the Event 201 video series in full, and in this post I took a closer look at the first 3 videos:
“Event 201 - At Best A Lobbying Convention”
Please, Chauncey, will you state exactly what you deduce from the evidence you set out?
I had originally been planning to just do one post, but I split it into 2. To summarize this first one:
Representatives of big corporations got together to lobby for finance in the event of a pandemic, and the representative of the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson also lobbied not only for government funds but also for relaxation of safeguards on vaccines.
The Chinese representative was essentially lobbying (with the help of the chairman) for medicines for China to be financed by other countries, and Avril Haines seemed to be agreeing to that i.e. finance will probably come from the US even though the US is heavily in debt to China.
I was generally highlighting the connections between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the pharmaceutical industry, which are becoming well known.
The lobbying came suspiciously soon before the “real” pandemic, that had many eery similarities to the predictions. However I wasn’t really coming to a definite conclusion in this post, I was more simply just trying to set out the above facts about and related to the event (maybe I should have put the title in the last section as SUMMARY not CONCLUSION therefore, I will change it). I will be coming to a more certain conclusion at the end of the second post.
Thanks. I await your certain conclusion with concern and interest.
Good info here -thanks again for doing this!
I really don’t think it’s going out on a limb to say this is too much to be a coincidence, about like the Jussie Smollet hoax. They create the exact scenario, and 6 weeks later, that exact scenario happens? Then you have all the connections between the Gates, Fauci, big Pharma, the WEF, etc.
(Question - you say Fauci is head of WHO - isn’t it the CDC or NIH or something?)
It appears to me their true motive in all this is to get that “public-private partnership” going, for profit and control. (as well as whatever insane plans for killing us off thru sterilization that Gates has in mind.)
Yes, a slip made there. Just an accident I’m sure. Fauci is head of the US Centers for Disease Control. WHO is a sub-agency of the disgusting UN. It is headed by an Ethiopian puppet of China, a biologist with no medical qualification.
Good spot, thanks Liz, I have corrected it, that doesn’t look too good when I’m fact-checking the fact-checkers 
. I was convinced he was head of the WHO for some reason, I think it’s because his face keeps appearing in the news as if he was a global authority on health.
The question remains as well whether that exact scenario regarding the origin in bats did happen or whether it was merely a hypothesis. That’s a question I’m becoming intrigued by, I was reading this “fact-check” on the subject from May, even they admitted there was less certainty about where the virus originated than I think had been originally claimed:
I think at this stage we can’t discount the possibility that what really happened was a sort of out-of-control groupthink - they were theorising about what they wanted to happen for their various interests but it wasn’t really planned as such.
Fauci sent US taxpayers’ money to Communist China for them to develop new diseases.
Whether Covid-19 escaped by accident or design, we don’t know. It should never have been developed in the first place. The development of it was certainly intentional.
They were researching bats in that lab, and possibly engineered the virus from the bats.
Apparently they didn’t expect the scenario to happen til a few years later, so the only “accident” may have been someone caught it and started spreading it sooner than they planned.
I read recently that Fauci and Pfizer (I think) had made a deal about the “vaccine” before it started.
My final post on the subject of Event 201:
This final post looks at the video discussion from the event on the subject of how to suppress dissent in the event of a coronavirus pandemic.
Good article. All very sinister, the way they use perfect “doublespeak” in planning for the takeover.
Their own view is the only correct information - anything contradicting it is, without question, “disinformation”, necessitating a “Ministry of Truth”.
It’s obvious, not only from what they say, but what they leave out, that this has nothing to do with preventing an actual crisis. It’s the creating of one. The participation of someone from the CIA is also very telling.
Thanks Liz. Yes I think serious questions need to be put to Ms Haines.