As journalist Elizabeth Nickson writes, “If Canada were a state, it would be poorer than West Virginia or Mississippi, despite being the second-largest country, with abundant natural resources, in the world, blessed with a highly educated populace.”
2 Likes
Yes!
Here’s a video worth watching.
The Opposition exposes the rottenness of Prime MinisterJustin Trudeau (Fidel Castro’s son) with documentary proofs.
1 Like
Trudeau is contemptible. The speaker here is Pierre Pollievre, the Leader of the opposition in our Parliament. He is smart, quick-witted, and handles himself admirable in the House of Commons. We are pinning our hopes on Pierre.
2 Likes
Both this article and the video show how Canada, the U.S., and Europe are all going by the same “script”. It’s been especially obvious since Covid, the lockdowns, and the fake “vaccines”.
And what do you know - Canada was in just as deep with the CCP as the U.S. was! Could it be that the CCP is the one who’s been writing the script?
Probably, in collaboration with the UN and WEF.
And will Trudeau be held accountable? Probably not, just as Biden won’t. They’ll just keep cheating.
1 Like
Trudeau may be held accountable in the next election in 2025.
2 Likes
Confirming that there are sound reasons for Cogito’s exasperation with the way Canada has gone and is going under Justin Trudeau’s dictatorship:-
[Edited Quote:]
The list of noxious measures, lapses, and deeds that tarnish Trudeau’s record include:
• the selling-out of Canada’s national identity
• the daunting number of scandals and ethics violations
• the many vacations on the public dime
• the admiration for the “basic dictatorship” of Communist China
• the cozying up to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum
• “the log-roll on behalf of shared interests, family businesses and powerful lobby groups” (in Alexander Brown’s pithy phrase)
• the indiscriminate welcoming of migrants into the country
• awarding a $10.5 million reparation payment to al-Qaeda terrorist Omar Khadr
• the imposition of a carbon tax that cripples the agricultural sector and impoverishes households across the country
• the invocation of the Emergencies Act (in effect, the War Measures Act), which included freezing bank accounts and taking political prisoners, to crush the Winter 2022 Trucker Freedom Convoy’s legitimate protest against the mandated Covid vaccines
• and the blizzard of Internet censorship bills …
Deserving separate mention for the magnitude of their effect are Trudeau’s two most recent legislative atrocities.
[He discusses the first of these, then comes on to the second.]
The Online Harms Act is … perhaps even more diabolical. …[It] includes fines of up to $70,000 levied on individuals for online hate speech and between $10 million to $25 million for any offending online platform. A new stand-alone hate offence would be added to the criminal code allowing for penalties of up to life imprisonment for hate crimes, subject to the interpretation of the Government and Canada’s Human Rights Tribunals. Such interpretation, warns University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist “is not subject to any legal or technical rules of evidence.” Rather, “balance of probabilities”, a notoriously flexible criterion of judgment, is the guiding principle.
The true focus is obviously not on preventing actual harms … but on snuffing anticipated and unformulated thought crimes and ultimately on silencing or canceling dissidents whose contestation might imperil the Liberal’s re-election prospects and the embedding of its totalitarian agenda.
We note that Greenpeace activist, former Heritage Minister and currently Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Steven Guilbeault, argued that disparaging posts about government institutions should be made illegal and that user-generated content should be stringently regulated. …
It would create a process whereby anonymous complaints alleging “hate speech” would be adjudicated, a sure-fire way of silencing a political opponent; whereby in certain cases warrantless entry would be permitted; whereby words could lead to life imprisonment, and judges could “put prior restraints on people who they believe on reasonable grounds may commit speech crimes in the future".
In the words of Justice Centre lawyer Marty Moore, “Far more draconian than being arrested for something you say, is being imprisoned for something someone else is afraid you’ll say.”
Run afoul of the Liberal government’s chameleon definition of hate … [and] you may find yourself serving a life sentence.
1 Like
Solway, as usual, is brilliant here. I particularly like his Emperor Trudeau Minimus". If this mindless twerp is not stopped, Canada’s future will be a jackboot on a human face, forever.
2 Likes
He’s doing a good job at “outdoing” his (real) father, Castro. And Biden’s just as bad.
“Hate speech” is such an obvious euphemism for “thought crime”, such a thinly veiled excuse for totalitarian rule - everyone knew it when they came up with it, years ago, but no- one ever stopped it.
Now we’re living in Orwell’s nightmare, and it’s too late to protest - you’ll get arrested for hate speech!
1 Like
Yes. If THEY threaten us with maiming and murder, it’s “free speech”.
If we criticize THEM for threatening us with maiming and murder, it’s “hate speech”. Also, of course racism, sexism, xenophobia, Islamophobia etc.
1 Like
Exactly!!!
1 Like