The absence of proven mass casualties?
The proof is there of the deaths and injuries caused by the vaccines, the lack of testing by the drug companies, the fact that they hid the data, and that they lied about alternative treatments like Hydroxychloroquine, which resulted in mass casualties! AND that they profited from all of that!
3 Likes
The problem is in the word âprovenâ. At the moment we have the VAERS and Yellow Card system data, but for all the thousands of reported deaths there is still official denial that even a substantial number of those deaths are connected to the jabs. Without individual autopsies on each one the denial is unfortunately plausible as well.
With regard to the alternative treatments there again is the same problem, they have the (only just) plausible excuse that there wasnât enough evidence that the alternatives worked. Obviously we know they worked hard to make sure that was the case, but how can we prove that the authorities knew that these treatments are effective?
Obviously we can judge them as morally bankrupt and worse, but what Iâm getting at here is that I donât think we have the kind of rock-solid evidence that would be needed for criminal convictions on the charge of murder or mass murder. Fraud is another matter though, there is abundant evidence of fraud, and as long as there is no investigation of the fraud we have to conclude that the rule of law is absent.
3 Likes
Well that figures. It fits what we know they are.
Of course these incredibly evil people would have figured the âplausible deniabilityâ angle into their scheme. If they can abuse people to that degree, and still be protected from accountability, then there is no longer any rule of law.
3 Likes