Quote:
The Russian invasion of Ukraine is worthy of full condemnation. But this needs to be known: Justin Trudeau—a man who admires Xi’s dictatorship of China and proved it by acting like him in crushing the peaceful protest of the truckers in Canada—has a strong admirer in Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky. They are both members of the World Economic Forum with its terrifying “Great Reset” goals. The “Great Reset” is a radical world socialist government plan designed by global elites to “reset” the world economy, and install a centralized, and heavily regulated totalitarian international system similar to that of China’s Social Credit System. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stated that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was one of the reasons he got into politics. The ubiquitous support for Zelensky by the elite, including support from “defund the police” and Black Lives Matter leftist mega-donor George Soros, Justin Trudeau, and Joe Biden, must rouse suspicion that Zelensky is as much an enemy of freedom as the Russian President, Vladimir Putin with his former ties to the KGB.
Well that wouldn’t surprise me. How many “good guys” have we rooted for who turned out to be complete frauds? Both Bush’s, Mitt Romney, Romneys running mate Ryan, Bill Barr…
I wouldn’t doubt Zelensky is paid for with Soros money, like half the crooked DA’s in the U.S…
Zelensky must take the leaders of the West as he finds them. He needs their patronage and protection in the war against Russia. He therefore cannot avoid toadying to Reset cultists who have taken over the institutions of the West and are currently in office.
Guilt-by-association is bad form - as Robert Spencer should know, having been a victim of it. I am surprised that he allows Christine Douglass-Williams to publish such a coy piece - “just wondering” about what all this associating can mean…
Is “Russophobia” the new “Islamophobia”? A false fear of Russia born of corrupt Western thinking? I fear so. Russians and Islamists are actually engaging in jihad (hot, cold, soft, hard, and in-between) against the West, which is running parallel to the Reset jihad. Robert Spencer himself is under no illusions about Putin and the “client” strongmen he installs as leaders over territory he subjugates.
As an American, I would far rather that the leader of Ukraine “associate” with the WEF elite than with Putin - for at least as long as they will aid the Ukrainian war effort (which won’t be for much longer.) With any luck, Zelensky will be able to toady up to a Trump, or a DeSantis who can expect a quid pro quo in his becoming an ally against the Reset cult.
C.Gee, your post is naive and out of touch with reality. “Russophobia is the new Islamophobia” and “I would far rather have the leader of Ukraine “associate” with the WEF elite” the same WEF that is robbing our money dry and says “you will own nothing and be happy” and he hasn’t shown any signs of diverging from the great reset. You are free to dislike Russia all you want, but I repeated escalating a proxy war to a potential Nuclear war is stupid and destructive idea. And there’s theses:
Yazmin,
Do you think Putin is the champion - the Hercules - to save the world from the WEF hydra? Is that what he is doing in Ukraine?
The thing that jumps out at me from this article is the point made about the timing of the ending of the freezing of accounts, just 2 days before Russia invaded Ukraine. I checked this, indeed this article is dated 22nd Feb, and Russia invaded Ukraine just two days later on the 24th Feb:
Of course the freezing of accounts was a controversial move and the Trudeau regime I think was worried about the mounting opposition.
This increases my suspicion that the events we’ve been witnessing since the start of 2022 were all planned in advance, in other words that Putin is one of the WEF hydra’s heads, because it raises the possibility that Trudeau had fore knowledge of Putin’s plans. Of course this is no sort of proof, but this is what I suspect.
All the way along they have pushed us with various measures to see how far they could go, and then rolled back each measure when opposition grew too strong, and new crises have arisen at very convenient moments - particularly the war coming just when opposition to the mass jabbing program was growing stronger. With each step though they set new precedents, now bank accounts of dissenters have been frozen and so if this occurs again, it won’t be so unprecedented next time around. I have been concerned to see how divided the dissenters have been over the Ukraine situation (we are arguing about it here), and I am very suspicious that the war is simply a distraction from the bigger agenda.
Please outline (briefly) the whole plot as you see it, who, what. when and why. From beginning to end.
OK well very briefly this is how I see it:
-
Create panic by creating the impression in people’s minds that a deadly pandemic is in progress (I’m not going to speculate about whether the virus was engineered or whether other factors really explain the spike in deaths e.g. the moving of the elderly from hospitals to care homes, to me this is a detail in the bigger scheme of things).
-
Introduce unprecedented levels of government control over the population, lockdowns, travel restrictions, mask mandates etc.
-
Introduce “vaccines” as the solution to the deadly pandemic, use the invented health crisis as a tool to coerce people into accepting digital ids, vaccine passes etc., and to gather as much data about our health, DNA etc. (remember data is the new gold in this digital age). Importantly this part of the plot is unravelling at the moment, but it might not matter because the powers that be have further tricks up their sleeves as follows.
-
Foment division by demonising the opponents to the above 2 measures.
-
As opposition to 2 and 3 starts to gather momentum, launch wars to distract the people and get people divided once again (people are becoming increasingly united in opposition to measures 2 and 3), the wars will escalate and damage the world economy substantially, but this will happen incrementally. First a war in Ukraine, then an invasion of Taiwan (probably).
-
Opposition to China’s move on Taiwan leads to a major global economic crisis as sanctions are introduced against China perhaps, giving the rich elite more opportunities to buy up land, property etc.
-
In the growing climate of crisis after crisis launch a cyber pandemic which will appear to come from Russia and China probably (remember Russia’s participation in the Cyber Polygon). The cyber pandemic will utterly destroy crypto currencies probably, which governments increasingly view as a threat to their power, besides more importantlly bringing people to the brink with energy shortages and food shortages.
-
Finally the coup de grâce, the world leaders sit down at talks to resolve their differences and hey presto the new world order global government is announced, ending national governments altogether. This global government will be quite similar to the CCP model I think. A single global CBDC will be the world currency, enabling dissent to be crushed at the press of a computer keyboard key.
Of course I COULD BE WRONG!!! 
I could be a raving conspiracy theorist!
Join the club, Chauncey!
Exception; I don’t think that the destruction of America’s energy will bring the world to the brink, but push it entirely over.
And, don’t forget the BRICS ( BRICS is the acronym coined to associate five major emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The BRICS members are known for their significant influence on world affairs. Since 2009, the governments of the BRICS states have met annually at formal summits.)
They are primed to ditch the US dollar in the basket of global currency by selecting to trade in one of theirs. When…IF America finally falls to third world significance, there goes the globe.
Of course, for an era only. Would I give up hope?!
I’ve been in the conspiracy theorist club for quite a while Jeanne
I think you’re exactly right.
Also they have been using the “climate crisis” for decades to destroy the worlds energy resources.
And the Third World invasion of Western countries.
Both of those are orchestrated to that end.
When you look at the overall picture, and simply listen to what they themselves have been openly admitting all along, it becomes obvious.
The war in Ukraine fits into this pattern, just as past wars have. Even if it wasn’t planned by them, it’s certainly working to their advantage in helping to destabilize world currencies and economies.
That would explain why no one seems to be trying very hard to resolve the conflict - they’re going to use it as long as they can to hasten the arrival of that moment of total collapse when they can take over completely.
On the assumption that your comment was not satirical, I have this response:
Of course Trudeau had “foreknowledge” of Putin’s plans. The entire world did. Putin had amassed his troops on the Ukraine border and had them sitting there for months. (He had also annexed he Crimea). And do not forget the US “intelligence” alarms over the weeks prior to invasion. “The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming.” As I recall, Zelensky, days before the invasion denied that it was imminent. Was this pre-war diplomatic shambles a deliberate, co-ordinated maneuver, orchestrated among Biden, Putin, Zelensky the Davos boys and that indispensable, towering Colossus of world-statesmanship, Trudeau, to time the “distraction” of the war for the optimal effect on the “people”?
What was Putin waiting for for all those weeks? For the great Trudeau to put an end to the trucker protest in Canada, so that the people would know that resistance to autocracy is futile. What decided Putin to invade on February 24th? He knew that the great Trudeau gave Zelensky a tinkle on the 23rd to assure him that the sacrifice of thousands of Ukrainian populist lives and the displacement of millions, plus world famine, plus a fossil fuel energy crisis, plus failing infrastructure, plus corruption of currencies through inflation and their replacement by carbon-offset-based crypto-curriences, would reconcile the people to the long-run benefits of a managed world economy led by unelected administrative experts fronted by autocratic heads of one-party-state governments. “Oh, and don’t worry about the putsch on Kyiv, Vlody, that 's just a fake-out. Vlady and all of us weffies want you to look good, so you can come to the table with head held high and sign away Ukrainian sovereignty with dignity. Soros and most of the ollies will unite behind the armistice deal, which we’ve already got our ESG boys working on. Let’s get this show on the road!”
Nowhere at all did I suggest that Trudeau was calling the shots in all this. What I am suggesting is that events since the start of 2020 have been part of a global conspiracy to re-shape the world, and I believe that the various WEF aligned leaders all have some degree of knowledge of the larger plan. Of course there were prior indications that Putin was planning something, but it wasn’t as if he had announced to the world exactly when he was going to make his move.
As I pointed out in the Conspiracy Denialists, people who deny there is any possibility that a global conspiracy is afoot ignore all the inconvenient facts that point to that. How do you explain the fact that the whole world, Putin and Xi Jinping included, all responded to a fake pandemic at exactly the same time in nearly exactly the same way (small exceptions only e.g. Sweden), with lockdowns, mask mandates and mass rollouts of poorly tested injections? I have freely admitted that I could be wrong about this global conspiracy but to deny the possibility of it seems to me to be the irrational position when we have an ever mounting pile of evidence that points to some such explanation.
Individual coincidences can be dismissed as just that, coincidences. However when you have a whole series of coincidences coming thick and fast that all point to a particular conclusion then it’s sensible to start considering the possibility that they are not coincidences at all.
Your above point suggests that you think that governments would never deliberately cause such catastrophic economic events, and yet that is clearly and precisely what they did do during the COVID-19 scamdemic, and they all did almost exactly the same damage to their own economies at exactly the same time! Any government could easily see that there was no health crisis simply by looking at their own nation’s mortality statistics, which nowhere were showing that anything particularly out of the ordinary was occurring (Peter Hitchens pointed this out way back in March 2020).
How do the following facts fit in with your theory that there is no global conpiracy:
-
Event 201 predicted a coronavirus pandemic 6 weeks before the first reported case of COVID-19 symptoms. Representatives of the US and Chinese governments’ militarized “Centres for Disease Control” were present at the meeting, as well as the woman who would soon become the head of US National Intelligence. Right on cue the world’s media were soon all together vastly exaggerating the scale of what was certainly little more than an annual seasonal respiratory outbreak, if that. The Gates Foundation and the WEF organized Event 201!
-
A similar internationally co-ordinated monkeypox pandemic planning event predicted a monkeypox pandemic would occur almost exactly when the world’s media started irrationally posting news articles about a monkeypox outbreak on their front pages, with articles coming almost every day. It was irrational because the disease was limited to a very small subsection of the population who engaged in risky behaviours.
-
In 2019 BlackRock convinced the Fed that a global economic crisis was imminent, the very next year this whole series of apparently catastrophic events began, largely precipitated by government actions everywhere - unnecessary lockdowns, travel restrictions damaged trade, then war.
Actually on re-reading our comments I see how you misread it to mean that, but you jumped to a conclusion; I wasn’t implying that Trudeau called Putin and said “right - move into Ukraine now”. All I was thinking was that possibly Trudeau, knowing that the move into Ukraine was about to occur, thought it would be a good opportunity to roll back on his own government’s authoritarian move to freeze bank accounts. Of course I could be wrong in this and any other particular detail, but all along the line since the start of 2020 they have been introducing unprecedented measures, and then rolling them back as soon as it gets a bit difficult.
Indeed, indeed, Chauncey. Yet…many people are not AWAKE, yet.
My invented telephone call satirically tried to imagine the inner workings of a “conspiracy.”
I cannot understand why you need a “conspiracy” to add mystery and menace to the actual operations of a political movement (call it Reset, but it is larger than the WEF) that has overtly taken over all the institutions through which civil life functions and is blatantly ruining the world according to explicit policies and agendas that have been noisily promulgated by economic summits, the UN, governments, international banks, international corporations, academic faculties, mainstream media, pension funds, unions, professional organizations, think-tanks, arts councils, charitable foundations, Hollywood etc. The global interlinking of corporate boards, officialdom, government agencies, media, reserve banks, universities, international rule-making bodies means that adherents of this political movement do not need to “conspire” together. They just need to do their jobs in the institutions which they have re-purposed - Reset - for global communitarianism and in which they are entrenched. They are all reading from the same bible, singing from the same hymn book. They don’t even need a secret handshake.
There is no secret plan which globally co-ordinates societal disruptions - war, famine, trucker protests, refugee and migrant flows, energy crises. These are the reality checks to Reset fantasy. Europe, the perfect example of a Reset governance institution has been smacked in the face by the upsurge in nationalism: first Brexit, then the Ukraine war - just when the globalist bureaucracy thought it had Ukraine under global institutional control, through the American State Department and the World Bank apparatchiks “partnering” with the Ukrainian bureaucracy. The Sri-Lankan fertilizer debacle was another reality check to the “Net Zero” Reset policy.
Putin - like Xi, and the other autocrats and tyrants of the globe - does not buy into Reset ideology for global regulatory governance, universal rationing, total population control, economies regulated by UN agencies rationing carbon. This would mean relinquishing his own power. He already is where the global regulators want to be: in command and in control of millions of people, multiple peoples. He can order his army to invade another country, his police to intimidate his civilians, his judges to keep the oligarchs in line - with no fear of political backlash from the electorate. He, like Xi, is perfectly well aware that the West is annihilating itself with Reset anti-capitalism (a campus sentiment originated in and sponsored by the Kremlin). He, like Xi, can go along with or veto UN agendas, sign on to global initiatives and breach them, as circumstances require. He, like Xi, exploits the pro and anti- Reset political divisions in the West for his own purposes - the anti-fossil fuel activism in Europe has made it dependent on Russia for oil and gas. Putin’s opportunistic use of the Reset movement to his geopolitical advantage does not demonstrate that he is conspiring with the government leaders who are part of it.
Youre right - Putin is opportunistically using the global Reset movement to his advantage.
And that’s the problem - as long as the West is suicidally annihilating itself with this Reset insanity, he and every other despot will have the advantage over us.
The West must free itself from the grip of the Globalist “conspiracy” - (or whatever you want to call it - it still has the same destructive effect) - and regain its own power, before we can deal effectively with our enemies.
I don’t need a conspiracy, that is a little offensive, I see evidence of one. Specifically as I already mentioned above in the Event 201 and monkeypox simulation which you seem to be determined to ignore. Obviously they stopped short of an admission that they were planning to create the illusion of a health crisis, but if you took the time to study these events closely, as I have done, you would be forced to admit that the proceedings were extremely suspicious.
As one example we have incontrovertible evidence of a conspiracy by politicians in the Blair administration to co-ordinate migrant flows into the UK. The evidence comes from their own mouths, after the fact. This was a secret plot that was never a part of their election manifesto (nor could it have been because they probably would not have been elected had it been).
Immigrants? We sent out search parties to get them to come… and made it hard for Britons to get work, says Mandelson
In the face of such indisputable evidence it is irrational to make such a generalisation as this:
There is no secret plan which globally co-ordinates societal disruptions
What’s more, later the intention of the globalist elite to force mass migration on the West became public, with the UN’s Migration Compact, which another globalist puppet politician Theresa May signed us up to without any serious public consultation. I am quite confident that the majority of the UK public are not even aware of the agreement, so although it is public knowledge the vast majority are kept in the dark by a complicit media, which is invariably working in line with the agenda of the globalists. That’s not the same thing as a “secret” plot, but in a sense it is secret as the deliberately misinformed masses (who vote) have no knowledge of it.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8459/
Incidentally “societal disruptions” were discussed at length in Event 201, before any such disruptions were occurring, quite eery predictions of the coming turmoil were mentioned as I described at length here:
Quote directly from the event:
this led to violent crackdowns in some countries and even martial law. Political upheaval became the rule across the globe; the public lost trust in their respective administrations. Several governments fell, while others were desperately striving to hold onto power. This spurred further crackdowns attempt to control media messaging originally aimed only at health-related misinformation became used increasingly to quash political dissent.
As for the global warming agenda, carbon rationing etc., these policies originated well before the rise of either Putin or Xi Jinping, and they were promoted by powerful financial interests in the West. You can trace the origins at least as far back as the Club of Rome in 1968, the involvement of David Rockefeller I believe was key. Therefore your assertion that this Reset anti-capitalism is merely “a campus sentiment originated in and sponsored by the Kremlin” is too simplistic, unless you suspect that David Rockefeller was a Soviet spy or at least influenced by Soviet spies?
If the purpose of these policies is to destroy democracy in the West (I strongly suspect that is their real purpose), then there is no necessity from a globalist agenda perspective for Putin or Xi to participate in them - they are yes already authoritarian leaders, they are already in alignment politically with the globalist agenda for the style of government they want. You almost seem to agreeing with me in some respects, this comment reads to me like a description of a global conspiracy with the same agenda as I envision:
I’m not really sure what you mean by “communitarianism”, and I’m not claiming to know exactly what sort of society the globalists want to create, but I rather tend to think it will allow some degree of free enterprise perhaps similar to the modern day Chinese state but with an ever increasing degree of state control over the population with the use of technology.
Yes, well said.
The evidence of a decades long coordinated agenda to destroy the stability of Western countries by overwhelming them with third world migrants, the hoax of climate change, and the idea of “global citizenship”, etc, is well known and documented.
Whether one wants to split hairs over calling it a “conspiracy” or not is irrelevant - it is happening.